elegantpaws:

GOD HE LOOKS SO POLITE

• “oh is this for me? really? are you sure?”
• “well okay if you insist. i hope i’m not taking too big of bites i know some people think that’s not gentlemanly”
• “oh this is really delicious, thank you so much i mean it”
• “mmm let me just savor the taste for a bit, mmmm oh yes thanks again for that”
• “yes that is very tasty. oh no you don’t have to give me anymore you’ve done so much already i couldn’t possibly accept so much kindness and generosity, you are an angel” 

(Source: empirestatebuilding)

shoreditchelite:

greenapplecheesecake:

gnarly:

unknownelandes:

SO THAT’S HOW THEY DO IT

I stared at this for 5 min omg

OMFG

Not only is this an incredibly subtle method for drinking, but when they built a machine to try to replicate it, they looked at what speed would allow for ‘optimal liquid gatherage’ they found that it was the exact same frequency that the cat was using regardless. 

(Source: yodiscrepo)

Olivia Colman’s acceptance speech at the BAFTAs 2013

(Source: nickmilller)

theambiguityreport:

I wouldn’t usually post a cat GIF on the internet (you don’t need my help) but this kitten completely loses it.

triahna:

kolkolkola:

wow that’s such a cute character where can I find him beaten up and crying on the ground in an alley

#gene hunt #sam tyler #yes please

(Source: kolkolkolas)

goatmusk:

i always feel inclined to reblog this because it is literally the best hair flip in the history of hair flips

(Source: dolaredola)

jackpowerx:

acornfarm:

defilerwyrm:

AHAHAHA NOT QUITE, OP, NOT QUITE

FUCKING NAILED IT

A+ commentary!

(Source: flowers-for-mr-ukki)

thescurfofworse:

atrapforfools:

signifierofmalepower:

My picks from #safetytipsforladies on Twitter.

See, this is how you can do satire/be funny about a serious subject without making light of it or the people who suffer because of it. Thank you and goodnight.

SEXUAL CONSENT VOLTRON

notesonascandal:

alexandraerin:

Say I’m 32 years old and you’re 22 years old.

In how many years will we be the same age?

…

Silly question, right? If you define aging as a process that stops at death, the only way we’ll ever be the same age is if I die first. If you don’t, then we’ll never be the same age. Every time you age a year, I also age a year. Since our ages increase at the same rate, you will never catch up to my head start. We have achieved a total equality of aging, but that does not change the permanent inequality of our age.

Okay, say I have a million dollars and you’re completely broke. If we both get a dollar a day, how long will it take you to catch up with me?

Now, this one’s even sillier, because if you have no other resources, your dollar a day is going to be eaten up by basic living expenses that it doesn’t quite meet, and I have an excess of money that can be spent on money-making opportunities that pay off far better than an additional $365 a year. I could literally burn the dollar I’m getting as part of our Totally Equal Income and still make more money in a year than you do just by sticking my money in the bank. 

But still: both of us getting a dollar a day is totally equal, right? It means we’re being treated exactly the same.

And now, final problem:

If we have a world that contains structural inequalities, systemic imbalances, disproportionate danger faced by some, and unequal access to resources and opportunities, is “treating everyone the same” really going to result in equality?

Show your work.